<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Corporate Woman &#187; Net Promoter Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/tag/net-promoter-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org</link>
	<description>Why choose failure, when success is an option?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Proving the value of NPS</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/proving-the-value-of-nps-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/proving-the-value-of-nps-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Promoter Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the next part of our series, we&#8217;re going to talk about how what to with the results you get back from NPS.  You&#8217;ve completed your survey design and fielded it to your customer and/or partner base.  At last, you &#8230; <a href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/proving-the-value-of-nps-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the next part of our series, we&#8217;re going to talk about how what to with the results you get back from <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a>.  You&#8217;ve completed your survey design and fielded it to your customer and/or partner base.  At last, you have your data.  Now what do you do with the results?  If you are anything like me, you could spend a lot of time reading the open ended responses and analyzing them.  And don&#8217;t get me wrong, this is important but in my experience, it&#8217;s not the next step.</p>
<p>The next step is connecting <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> results to customer data to determine lifetime values.  Our data showed conclusively that the more likely a customer is to recommend, the longer they tend to stay with us.  Showing this proves the value of <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a>.  It ties the results to dollars, which is key in determining which improvement issue to go after first. </p>
<p>A simple ranking of the number of customer mentions without an attachment to dollars makes it very difficult for your key stakeholders in the business to develop ROI scenarios.  But ranking them with the addition of lifetime value makes a significant difference.  If you can also add in the reasons why customers cancel and the reasons why customers choose not to buy, you have a powerful business case for change that is built in lifetime value (dollars of potential revenue) and is anchored in <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> results.   How many of you are connecting your <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> results to customer lifetime value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/proving-the-value-of-nps-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPS Survey Levels</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/nps-survey-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/nps-survey-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Promoter Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a call with a colleague in the customer experience field today.  He had some very good questions about how to decide the focus of your NPS survey.  It was an interesting discussion and I thought it worthwhile to &#8230; <a href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/nps-survey-levels/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a call with a colleague in the customer experience field today.  He had some very good questions about how to decide the focus of your <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> survey.  It was an interesting discussion and I thought it worthwhile to share with you in my blog, perhaps as a series.  I&#8217;m going to tackle the survey design questions in this blog.</p>
<p>First subject &#8211; how detailed do you focus the survey?  A key decision early on in the program.  There are three levels you can measure <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> and each has varying degrees of impact. </p>
<ul>
<li>At the top level, you have the brand <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a>.  If your brand has strong recognition and powerful ties to decision making this can tie <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a>.  This can be valuable to get a sense for your share of word of mouth but may not get you sufficient detail by itself to help you drive improvements. </li>
<li>The mid-level view or as I like to call it, the actionable level is the product <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a>.  This is specific to the product they own and would they recommend it.  This helps a great deal because it can get you several why&#8217;s down in five why analysis within the survey itself and helps identify the strengths and weaknesses of each product.  It also ensures that the data is not skewed by a strong influencer (negative or positive), which can happen in the top level measure.</li>
<li>The tactical level or operational view is really about areas such as service or training.  If you sell this in addition to the product, it can be quite valuable to measure at this level, in conjunction with what product the service or training was delivered on.  Because these are heavily customer facing, they are strong driver elements.</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s important to look across the business you serve in from the view of customer.  This helps immensely when designing what levels to survey and how frequently to survey.  At the heart of any <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> program, in my opinion, is driving improvements in your customer&#8217;s experience, which results in a stronger company from a longevity and revenue perspective.  Ensuring that each survey point is purpose designed and driven towards gaining you actionable data is core to your survey design.  When you have that purposeful leveling structure, you know how detailed your survey needs to be, which means you get to keep it short and focused.  How do you structure your <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> survey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/11/nps-survey-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Promoter Score (NPS) is more than a number.</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/05/net-promoter-score-nps-is-more-than-a-number/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/05/net-promoter-score-nps-is-more-than-a-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Promoter Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that I am going to be in the midst of competing views here but I use NPS where I work and have built a previous NPS program as well &#8211; I like it and it works.  Say what &#8230; <a href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/05/net-promoter-score-nps-is-more-than-a-number/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that I am going to be in the midst of competing views here but I use <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> where I work and have built a previous <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> program as well &#8211; I like it and it works.  Say what you will of the method (and believe me, there is much that has been said/written/blogged on it, good and bad), the core of it comes down to really listening to your customers, taking action on what you learn and letting them know they are heard.  For me, that&#8217;s the key.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often said that the <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> question itself (and the resulting score) are the least important parts of an <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> program and survey.  Before I anger anyone, please note that I said least important, <strong>not</strong> that they aren&#8217;t valuable at all.  What is more important, in my view, is the &#8220;why&#8221; for the score given and &#8220;what would it take to improve&#8221;.  This is where the listening gets good.</p>
<p>Once you have all that great data from your customers, it&#8217;s time to turn it into actionable information.  That&#8217;s done by taking the <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> data and tying it to other key data.  That&#8217;s going to vary for your business but it could be market channel, customer value, number of customers, retention, country, product, brand&#8230; well, I think you see where this could go, right?</p>
<p>Customer feedback that&#8217;s just a number that everyone watches and argues about is not really all that helpful, is it?  The real power comes from the program you build around the <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> data you collect and the tools you develop as a result.  Taking action on customer feedback and letting your customers know they are heard.  And who doesn&#8217;t want to buy from a company like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2009/05/net-promoter-score-nps-is-more-than-a-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proving the value of NPS</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2008/11/proving-the-value-of-nps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2008/11/proving-the-value-of-nps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Promoter Score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecorporatewoman.org/2008/11/20/proving-the-value-of-nps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked the question about how do you prove that measuring NPS is worthwhile (or any other loyalty metric).  It was an interesting and good question but it is sort of like asking how do I prove that &#8230; <a href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2008/11/proving-the-value-of-nps/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked the question about how do you prove that measuring <a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> is worthwhile (or any other loyalty metric).  It was an interesting and good question but it is sort of like asking how do I prove that love is better than not having love.  I know, I know&#8230; an odd example perhaps but also ephemeral to prove or disprove.  Here is what I think about that (<a href="http://www.netpromoter.com">NPS</a> not love &#8211; I&#8217;ll save that for another post):</p>
<p>Customer loyalty (or even the power of recommendation) itself is not what needs to be proven, we know it exists and operate on it many times when we make purchasing descisions, whether they are business or personal choices.  What needs to be proven is how you can use measuring customer loyalty to actually drive positive change that not only results in growing your business but also in an improved customer experience.  This actually comes down to the ability to monetize the value of score because money really does talk in this case.  You have to be able to link the lifetime value, likelihood to recommend, frequency of recommendations and repurchase together to build a financial and customer focused picture of how your customers behave and what engages their loyal behavior.  It can be done and I have done it, so I know it works.  The interesting thing to me is how many times companies don&#8217;t take it this extra step, which enables you to make actionable business cases for change that benefits both customers and the business.  Food for thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2008/11/proving-the-value-of-nps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

