<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Corporate Woman &#187; focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/tag/focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org</link>
	<description>Why choose failure, when success is an option?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Measuring customer retention or you get what you measure</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2010/03/measuring-customer-retention-or-you-get-what-you-measure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2010/03/measuring-customer-retention-or-you-get-what-you-measure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most companies measure the number of customers who leave them in some form or fashion.  Most call it churn.  This is not a bad thing, not as such.  But think of it like this, if you get what you measure, &#8230; <a href="http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2010/03/measuring-customer-retention-or-you-get-what-you-measure/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most companies measure the number of customers who leave them in some form or fashion.  Most call it churn.  This is not a bad thing, not as such.  But think of it like this, if you get what you measure, why do you want to measure the number of customers leaving?  Wouldn&#8217;t you prefer a measure that tells you about the number of customers you&#8217;re keeping?  Can you see how the focus shifts?  How the goals are different?  I like keeping the attention on how to keep your customers.  I like seeing how well we do at that and studying and listening about how to do it even better. </p>
<p>Measuring retention instead of churn shouldn&#8217;t be anymore difficult, as metrics go.  It should be designed to fit how you sell in your marketplace and around customer behavior.  I like how retention metrics focus on the positive and language turns into more customer focused intentions rather than preventative measures.  I like how retention can be proactive (&#8220;What can we do to be even better? How would you like to see us improve?&#8221;) and gets you out of being strictly reactive (&#8220;Oh, you want to leave?  Can we do something to keep you now?&#8221;)  Being focused on keeping the customer once they have decided to leave feels like &#8220;too little, too late&#8221;.  At that point, I am often more insulted than interested in taking any offer to stay.  Why wasn&#8217;t I valuable enough to you for this discounted offer <strong>before</strong> I decided to leave you?</p>
<p>So I vote that it&#8217;s time to leave behind the churn metrics and move forward into retention metrics.  Let&#8217;s show our customers we care about them now, while they are still with us on that customer experience ride.  What do you say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecorporatewoman.org/2010/03/measuring-customer-retention-or-you-get-what-you-measure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

